|
TEXTBOOK:
Magleby 24th Edition, Chapter 9 (pp. 249-254), Chapter 10
(pp. 274-292), Chapter 12 (pp. 324-346),
Chapter 13 (pp. 350-369)
{Magleby 2009 Brief Edition, Chapter 7 (pp. 216-239), Chapter 9
(pp.268-296), Chapter 10 (pp. 298-320)}
|
|
OBJECTIVES
4.1
Explain the differences between the positions of president and prime
minister.
4.2 Discuss the approach
taken by the Founders in regard to executive power.
4.3
Sketch the evolution of the presidency from 1789 to the present.
4.4
List and describe the various offices that make up the executive
branch.
4.5
Review presidential character, and explain how these relate to the
achievements in office of various presidents.
4.6
Discuss the various facets—formal and informal—of presidential power
4.7
Prioritize the three ways in which the U.S. public bureaucracy
contrasts with those of other nations.
4.8
Discuss the recruitment, retention, and demographic profiles of
federal bureaucrats.
4.9
List the four factors that account for the behavior of bureaucrats
4.10 Review
congressional measures to control the bureaucracy and evaluate their
effectiveness.
4.11 Describe the
evolution of journalism in United States political history
4.12 Demonstrate
how the characteristics of the electronic media have affected the
actions of public officials and candidates.
4.13 Describe the
impact of the pattern of ownership and control of the media on the
dissemination of news.
4.14 Discuss
“media bias” and assess the impact of this bias on the electorate.
|
|
OUTLINE
A President, chosen by the people and with powers derived from a
written constitution, has less power than does a prime minister.
Separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches,
the distinguishing feature of the political system in the United
States, means that the president must compete with Congress in
setting policy and even in managing executive agencies. Though the
president seemingly controls a vast executive branch apparatus, only
a small proportion of executive branch personnel are presidential
appointees or nominees. Even these may not be under presidential
control.
Presidential power, though still limited, has grown from its
constitutional origins as a result of congressional delegation, the
increased importance of foreign affairs, and public expectations.
But while the presidential office has more power today, the
president also faces higher expectations. As a result, presidential
effectiveness depends on the nature of the issues to be confronted
and the support gained from informal sources of power such as the
power to persuade. Public opinion and congressional support are
extremely important. Each president must conserve power (and energy
and time, concentrating these scarce resources to deal with a few
matters of major importance. Virtually every president since
Franklin D. Roosevelt has tried to gain better control of the
executive branch—by reorganizing, by appointing White House aides,
by creating specialized staff agencies—but no president has been
satisfied with the results.
In dealing with Congress, the president may be able to rely somewhat
on party loyalty. Presidents whose party controls Congress tend to
have more of their proposals approved. But such loyalty is
insufficient. Every president must also cajole, award favors, and
threaten vetoes to influence legislation. Most presidents discover
that their plans are at the mercy of unexpected crises.
Bureaucracy is characteristic of almost all aspects of modern life,
not just the government. The power of a bureaucracy should be
measured by its discretionary authority. Four factors are
particularly influential in the United States.
Here, government bureaucracies (1) must answer to competing sources
of political authority, (2) must function in a constitutional system
that fragments power, (3) are asked to achieve vague and competing
goals, and (4) lack incentive systems that value efficiency.
The role of journalists in a democratic society poses an inevitable
dilemma: If they are to serve well as information gatherers,
gatekeepers, scorekeepers, and watchdogs, they must be free of
government controls. But to the extent that they are free of such
controls, they are also free to act in their own political or
economic interests. In the United States, a competitive press
largely free of government controls has contributed to a substantial
diversity of opinion and a general (though not unanimous) commitment
to the goal of fairness in news reporting. The national media are in
general more liberal than the local media, but the extent to which a
reporter’s beliefs affect reporting varies greatly with the kind of
story—routine, feature, or insider.
|